7 Ways Jeremy Corbyn’s Leadership has Changed Labour for the Better

Britain Refugee March

Jeremy Corbyn speaking at a solidarity with refugees demonstration 12th September, 2015. (AP Photo)

A curious notion that is seemingly gaining traction is that under Jeremy Corbyn, Labour still essentially stands for the same polices as we did under Ed Miliband. So here’s my attempt to set out some clear differences, which I believe represent substantial improvements in several key policy areas.

  1. Austerity: For the previous leadership, committing to an anti-austerity economic approach would jeopardise our “economic credibility”. Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls announced that a Labour government would stick to Tory spending plans, which would involve making severe cuts. Labour now unambiguously rejects austerity as a means of economic recovery and new Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell’s “fiscal rule” does not commit Labour to any cuts.
  2. Welfare: On numerous occasions under Miliband, Labour failed to oppose government attacks on welfare. On the Bedroom Tax, the Labour leadership prevaricated, as Shadow DWP Minister Liam Byrne refused to commit to abolishing the Bedroom Tax, and it wasn’t until September 2013 that Miliband actually pledged to scrap it. Worse was the abstention on the government’s illegal use of workfare in March 2013. A year later, Labour MPs were whipped to vote for the welfare cap. Under Corbyn’s leadership, every single attack on social security from the Welfare Bill (in October 2015), Tax Credits cuts and cuts to PIP and ESA has been opposed outright.
  3. Trade unions: When public sector workers took strike action in June 2011, Miliband gave an interview in which he repeatedly said “these strikes are wrong”, and later went along with the fabrications about Unite’s role in the Falkirk selection. Contrast this to Corbyn and John McDonnell, who have stood in solidarity on picket lines and rallies with the junior doctors. Furthermore, Corbyn has committed Labour to significantly strengthening trade union rights in Britain, such as a return to collective bargaining.
  4. Railways: Previous Labour policy was to legislate to allow a public sector operator to be able to bid for franchises alongside private operators. Corbyn by contrast has pledged to return railways back into public ownership as the franchises expire.
  5. Education: Miliband backed the idea of tuition fees, arguing that fees should be reduced from £9k to £6k a year. Corbyn has repeatedly argued for the total abolition of tuition fees.
  6. Foreign policy: To his credit, during his tenure Miliband did whip the PLP against bombing Syria and for recognising the state of Palestine. And on the Iraq war, Miliband stated that Labour was “wrong”, although Corbyn went considerably further by making a full apology. But Corbyn represents a very clear break, given that Miliband backed the bombing of Libya in 2011 and Iraq in 2014 and supported Trident renewal.
  7. Immigration: Ahead of last year’s general election Miliband indulged in a crass attempt to pander to anti-immigrant sentiment with a ‘controls on immigration’ pledge, which was infamously carved into stone and printed on mugs. There was also a pledge to ban new EU migrants from receiving any kind of social security for at least two years. Contrast this to Corbyn, who has repeatedly praised the contribution of migrants to society and the economy; pointed out during the EU referendum campaign that Britain could not have access to the single market but reject freedom of movement and whose first act as Labour leader was to address a demonstration in solidarity with refugees.

4 thoughts on “7 Ways Jeremy Corbyn’s Leadership has Changed Labour for the Better

  1. Haravikk says:

    All well said! It’s interesting to contrast these with what Owen Smith has been saying; as keen as he is to be seen to be agreeing with Jeremy Corbyn on everything, Owen Smith’s investment plans are much less ambitious, and he supports further reduction of welfare spending (even though our welfare system is already weak and under strain), which means he smacks a great deal of austerity-lite v2.0.

    He’s pro-Trident for weak reasons (thinks £205 billion is reasonable for a bargaining chip) and thinks that making 50% or more of his shadow cabinet is enough to improve equal rights for women (Corbyn meanwhile promotes improvements to education, addressing pay imbalances and so-on).

    He also doesn’t seem to have mentioned tackling tax-avoidance, but instead has focused entirely on undoing Tory tax-cuts; which is meaningless if all we’re taxing is what doesn’t disappear through tax-avoidance. He hasn’t mentioned re-nationalisation of even the privatised parts of the NHS, let alone more ambitious re-nationalisation plans like the rail companies.

    In other words, the things you’ve very adeptly identified as different between Corbyn and Ed Miliband, have an awful lot still in common between Corbyn and Owen Smith.

  2. Trudy Sellers says:

    This is a particularly fine and clear statement of key ways in which Corbyn is more principled, more socialist, more serious In opposition then Milliband, than Labiur under Milliband

  3. Very useful Paul I’d been thinking about that, but it seemed very daunting to try to tease out the distinctions. But you’ve done it. Well done and thanks!

  4. mike halshaw says:

    them why is labours polling as low as it is? he doesn’t resonate with the wider public outside of his metropolitan bunker

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s